25 de março de 2009

Prova de Química

Numa prova escrita da Escola de Química da USP, foi feita aseguinte pergunta, entre outras:
- Qual a diferença entre SOLUÇÃO e DISSOLUÇÃO?

Resposta de um aluno:
- Colocar UM dos NOSSOS POLÍTICOS num TANQUE DE ÁCIDO SULFÚRICO, porexemplo, para que se DISSOLVA é uma DISSOLUÇÃO. Colocar TODOS é umaSOLUÇÃO.

Aprovado, com louvor!

24 de março de 2009

Transparência Brasil

Transparência Brasil – Portal da Transparência (http://www.portaldatransparencia.gov.br)


Às vezes, e somente às vezes, alguns de nós somos acometidos pela curiosidade intrínseca do ser humano, e saímos pesquisando “coisas” na internet.

Esses dias me deparei com o Portal da Transparência, mantido pela Controladoria-Geral da União – CGU.

São momentos assim que nos trazem elementos “estranhos” que nos aguçam ainda mais a curiosidade, nos fazendo cavar e cavar cada vez mais, buscando informações sobre o assunto.

Eis que encontrei algo que, no mínimo, é curioso. Vejam abaixo as informações que colhi e tirem suas próprias conclusões...

No endereço eletrônico acima, encontrei a empresa:

- CENTRO DE ESTUDOS SOCIAIS COMTEMPORÂNEOS (CNPJ 92.922.459/0001-60), cuja atividade principal é 85.99-6-99 - Outras atividades de ensino não especificadas anteriormente, isso mesmo, "ensino" e escrevem o nome da empresa com “m” antes do “t”... Sinistro! Essa entidade sem fins lucrativos recebeu até o momento R$2.772.486,89 de recursos do Governo Federal.

Esse CNPJ está registrado na Receita Federal do Brasil com a atividade principal de “85.99-6-99 - Outras atividades de ensino não especificadas anteriormente”, até aí, além do erro de português aparentemente proposital, nada de mais.

O montante recebido foi para executar serviços de “8854 – Gestão e Comunicação do PRONASCI”, no município de Bagé/RS, na função de Segurança Pública.

Resumindo o assunto, se formos direto ao convênio relacionado com o “trabalho” a ser executado, encontraremos o seguinte:

- Convênio 640370 – Implementação do Núcleo Local de Gestão do Programa Nacional de Segurança Pública com Cidadania (PRONASCI) na cidade de Porto Alegre e municípios da Região Metropolitana.

- Valor do convênio: R$3.960.695,55 – aprovado em 15/01/2009;
- Valor liberado: R$ R$2.772.486,89 – liberado em 22/01/2009;
- Vigência: 13/01/2009;
- Validade: 13/01/2010.

Agora imaginem vocês terem uma empresa que faz um contrato de 01 ano e que recebem, já na primeira parcela, 70% do total do contrato. E olha que não tiveram que prestar contas de nada ainda no momento do recebimento! Bacana!

E agora, qual é a impressão de vocês sobre isso? E olha que tem tantas liberações de recursos interessantes para dar uma olhada no Portal. Depois façam isso, só para descontrair um pouco. (risos)
Não quero causar polêmicas com esse texto, quero apenas compartilhar minha curiosidade!

19 de março de 2009

Entrevista Coletiva 14/03/2009: Presidentes Obama e Lula da Silva

THE WHITE HOUSE
Office of the Press Secretary - March 14, 2009
REMARKS BY PRESIDENT OBAMA
AND PRESIDENT LULA DA SILVA OF BRAZIL
IN PRESS AVAILABILITY
Oval Office
12:17 P.M. EDT


PRESIDENT OBAMA: Hello, everybody. Sorry to make you guys work on a Saturday.
The President and I just had a wonderful meeting. I have been a great admirer of Brazil and a great admirer of the progressive, forward-looking leadership that President Lula has shown throughout Latin America and throughout the world.
We have a very strong friendship between the two countries, but we can always make it stronger in areas like energy and biofuels, in the interest in increasing the standards of living in impoverished countries throughout Latin America, expanding trade relationships -- you know, the President and I had a wonderful meeting of the minds.
And I'm grateful that he took the time to visit with us. We intend to have a host of meetings at a ministerial level in the coming days and weeks, both in preparation for the G20, to coordinate our activities to strengthen global economic growth; also in anticipation of the Summit of the Americas that will be taking place in April, so that we can have a proactive strategy that uses the strength of the U.S.-Brazilian relationship to strengthen ties throughout the hemisphere.
So I'm very grateful to him for taking the time to visit, and I'm looking forward to reciprocating in a visit to Brazil sometime soon.

PRESIDENT LULA: (As translated.) First of all, I'd like to say that we have strong, very good relations between the U.S. and Brazil.
Secondly, I mention the importance of President Obama's election, what it represents to the world and especially to Latin America.
The third issue that we discussed is the economic crisis the world is facing today. President Obama and myself are truly convinced that the economic crisis can be resolved by political decisions that could be made on the G20 meeting.
We need to restore credibility, vis-à-vis society as a financial system. We need to restore credibility and trust of the people, vis-à-vis the governments, and for that we need to make credit flowing and pouring in all countries; and also to facilitate trade flow amongst different countries. And we will work together to build a proposal for the G20 meeting. I believe that is extremely important. But all the leaders that will participate in the G20 meeting should be convinced that we have to make more quicker decisions.
That is to say the number of unemployed people are increasing in the world. And the unemployed of today is a social problem of tomorrow. Because we have to take care of this issue very seriously because we already see migrant workers facing many problems in different countries.
We also discussed other matters that are of common interest in the U.S.-Brazil relations. The possibility for us to do some joint work vis-à-vis Africa. We tried to establish a development policy for Latin America, and mainly to strengthen our relations and what has to do with biofuels. And I also believe that President Obama carries the responsibility and has a unique and exceptional position to improve the relationships with Latin America. And I told President Obama that I know it won't be easy, but we should try to reopen the Doha Round negotiations.
And I also told President Obama that in the public rallies that I have in Brazil that I tell to the Brazilian people: I'm praying more for him than I pray for myself. Because with just 40 days in office -- to suffer and to face such a terrible crisis the U.S. is facing today, I don't want to be in his position. (Laughter.)

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I tell you what, you sound like you've been talking to my wife. (Laughter.)
We're going to call on a couple of reporters. I'm going to start with Mark Knoller, at CBS Radio.

Q Yes, Mr. President. The Chinese Premier is worried about the trillion dollars his government has invested in U.S. government securities. He wants a guarantee. Is there something you can say to him to allay his concerns?
And President Lula, your government also has investments in U.S. government securities. Are you worried about them, as well?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, I think that there's a reason why even in the midst of this economic crisis you've seen actual increases in investment flows here into the United States. I think it's a recognition that the stability not only of our economic system, but also our political system, is extraordinary.
And so I think that not just the Chinese government, but every investor, can have absolute confidence in the soundness of investments in the United States. And that is not just in U.S.-issued Treasury notes, but also in the private sector and the commerce and the industry that has made this the most dynamic economy in the world.
There was a question directed to President Lula.

PRESIDENT LULA: I believe that we do have a concern. What is the basic concern? As the money from the emerging countries, there's some flex to buy Treasury bonds in countries like the U.S., then we'll have less money in our domestic market, so that we can put to work industrial sector. This is a problem that we will have to discuss at the G20 meeting.
I say every day Brazil was the last country to be affected by the crisis. But we also have the possibility to be one of the first countries to resolve and get out of the crisis. We don't face any problem in our financial system; maybe we can face some problems with our exports and with a credit crunch. But the truth of the matter is that money has vanished. And if we don't get the credit supply flowing again, then yes, the crisis could deepen in our country.
So that's why I believe it's urgent to reestablish the credit supply in the world.

Q (As translated.) I have a question for President Lula and a question for President Obama.
President Lula said that during their meeting they talked about energy, President Obama talked about a possible partnership for energy within the hemisphere. The question I have is can't this partnership get off-balance? Because there's a lot of interest in the future of Brazilian oil. Brazilians do not understand today how come that a fuel -- that a clean fuel that is renewable fuel can't reach U.S. market because of duties, whereas the same product, essential clean fuel in the United States gets incentives. Where would be the balance between these two issues?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Is that directed at me? Well, look, I think Brazil has shown extraordinary leadership when it comes to biofuels. And I've been a great admirer of the steps that have been taken by President Lula's government in pursuing biofuels and developing them. And this is an investment that Brazil has made for a very long time.
My policies coming into this administration have been to redouble efforts here in the United States to pursue a similar path of clean energy development. And I think we have a lot to learn from Brazil.
As I mentioned to President Lula, I think we have the potential to exchange ideas, technology to build on the biodiesel cooperation structure that we've already established. I know that the issue of Brazilian ethanol coming into the United States has been a source of tension between the two countries. It's not going to change overnight, but I do think that as we continue to build exchanges of ideas, commerce, trade around the issue of biodiesel, that over time this source of tension can get resolved.

PRESIDENT LULA: This is the very first meeting that we have between the Brazilian administration and President Obama's administration to discuss this issue. Actually, my answer is built in your question. I can't also understand while the world is concerned with climate change and with carbon emissions that bring greenhouse effect, (inaudible) fuel gets tariffs, and clean fuel also gets tariffs. I have discussed this with Angela Merkel, with Tony Blair when he was Prime Minister, with President of France, Sarkozy, with former President Bush.
I never expect an immediate answer. This is a process. As time goes by, Brazil is proving that biofuel is an extraordinary alternative. And slowly the countries will be convinced. And slowly other countries will join the biofuel effort. That's what I believe.
A seminar will be held in New York City on Monday, where I will attend, and this will be a strong issue that will be discussed there. I talked with President Obama about the possibility for us to build partnerships with third-party countries, especially a joint project with the African continent. And things will move forward as people start changing. No one can change overnight, in terms of their energy matrix. Thank God for 30 years Brazil has already control -- technological control and know-how on this issue.
And when President Obama comes to visit Brazil I'm going to ask him to get inside a car that is run by a flex-fuel engine and he will feel very comfortable.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I actually had a flex-fuel vehicle. But one of the problems here in the United States is, is that we don't have enough gas stations that have biofuels in them. So that's one of the areas that we need to change our distribution networks here in the United States.
We've got Jeff Mason.

Q Yes, sir, right here. Mr. President and Mr. President, you mentioned the G20. Do you intend to work together on moves related to fiscal stimulus? Did you ask the President to join the side of the U.S. in pushing for fiscal stimulus over financial regulation?
And Mr. President, do you side with the Europeans or with the U.S. on that issue?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Jeff, I'm glad you gave me the opportunity to address this. I don't know where this notion has emerged that somehow there are sides developing with respect to the G20. They're not emerging from Tim Geithner, they're not coming from Larry Summers, and they're not coming from me. So unless you have some secret source in the administration -- if you will follow the track of this story line, it is completely contrary to what our policies are.
Look, this is not a either/or question; this is a both/and question. We do believe that it is important for all countries around the world to step in and figure out how we can ensure that we are compensating for the drastic contraction in global demand. We're not unique in that position. Gordon Brown feels the same way, as does President Hu in China. Kevin Rudd has taken similar steps in Australia. And the Europeans have taken some steps with respect to stimulus and increasing global demand.
Not every country is going to do the same levels. I think it would be useful if we have a international body that is -- that is accounting for how much stimulus is taking place out there, just so that, you know, various foreign ministries can keep track of what's happening with respect to global demand.
But as I've said here in this country, and I will repeat in the G20, fiscal stimulus is only one leg in the stool. We have to do financial regulation, and nobody is going to be a more vigorous promoter of the need for a reform of our financial systems. I think most of those initiatives are going to be taking place in individual countries, but there's going to need to be coordination between the various countries.
And I've already spoken to my economic team, along with members of Congress, and I've said to the American people, we are going to be moving very aggressively to make sure that the systemic risks that exist right now, that we are dealing with those so that this kind of crisis will not happen again.
So I can't be clearer in saying that there are no sides. This is a phony debate that I think has been -- has evolved over the last few days in the news cycle. We think that we have to take a whole range of approaches. Financial regulation is front and center in terms of issues that we want to deal with. We also think we've got to see worldwide concerted action to make sure that the massive contraction in demand is dealt with.
And then there are going to be other steps to deal with emerging markets, for example, and what are we doing to help them get access to credit; very poor countries, figuring out how do we make sure that their food supplies are adequately dealt with.
So there are going to be a host of issues that we have to deal with. But in my mind at least there is no conflict or contradiction between the positions of the G20 countries and how we're going to be moving forward. There's going to be differences in details. Those are being worked out right now. I expect to have a productive meeting.
Sorry to take so long on the answer, but, you know, Jeff always does this to me.

PRESIDENT LULA: That's not a problem, Mr. President -- Presidents talking too much. (Laughter.) Because we all talk too much. (Laughter.) It is very good that you should take into account the problem.
On April 2nd in London, the main leaders of the world will gather, and we cannot afford going to such a meeting just to discuss whom we should put the blame on. We have to sit in the roundtable and find a resolution to the crisis. We all know that we have to restore credit supply policies in the world. We have to have a special credit supply for the poorest countries and the developed countries. And we also have to strengthen international institutions like the IMF, the World Bank, and so on.
So we will attend that meeting to make decisions. We are in a large ship and water is leaking. Now is the time to fix the leaking and make the economy go back to the tracks. And there are two key words: Reestablish and restore credit in the world, and restore trust and confidence between -- amongst the people. And then from there on we'll make the decisions. We can have some divergence at some time, but that belongs -- it's proper to democracy.
I am confident that this crisis -- it's a very delicate one -- but at the same time it is an extraordinary opportunity so that we can prove for those that elected us that we are capable to cope with major issues. Every country has to go back and start investing in infrastructure, in housing projects, in education, in health care.
The bottom line is that what we need and I'm sure that that's President Obama's concern, too. And my own concern is to create jobs, to create incomes and consumption and that on the -- that it will also -- that will unfold and generate new development.
So I'm very much optimistic. There's no individual way out for a country (inaudible); that we have to make joint decisions. And that's why I will go to London to participate in this discussion.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: One last question.

Q Thanks, Mr. President.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: How are you?

Q Good, thanks. You both have been criticizing -- (as translated) -- both of you criticized protectionism and warning people about the dangers of protectionism, especially in a crisis time like this one. However, Brazil refuses to make concessions that the U.S. thinks are important so that some progress can be done at WTO. At the same time, the U.S. adopts a stimulus package that prevents Brazilian businesses or companies to participate in projects that are financed by the stimulus package. Has there been any progress made in these two attitudes so that will give this whole discourse a practical tone?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, we discussed during the course of our meeting, and we are going to have our -- Foreign Minister of Brazil and the Secretary of State of the United States, Secretary Clinton, discuss these issues in more detail.
I think it is very important for all countries to recognize that trade is an important engine for economic growth. I think there's a natural tendency at a time of economic difficulty -- people losing their jobs, businesses closing -- to want to focus inward and ensure that any sacrifices are taking place somewhere else, as opposed to here at home, because people are already going through tremendous hardships. That's true in Brazil, that's true here in the United States.
But I think that it is important for us to understand that ultimately U.S. businesses will benefit from our exports, that imports from Brazil can actually provide us access to products and services that consumers want here in the United States. I think the same is true in Brazil, and the same is true worldwide. Our goal should be to at least not go backwards.
So, for example, the "Buy American" provision that was in our stimulus bill, my administration worked actively with our Congress to make sure that any provision in there did not violate WTO and will not be interpreted in a way that violates the WTO. And I'm sure that President Lula is going to be taking similar steps in Brazil to make sure that we are not moving in reverse when it comes to world trade.
It may be difficult for us to finalize a whole host of trade deals in the midst of an economic crisis like this one, although we have committed to sitting down with our Brazilian counterparts to find ways that we can start closing the gap on the Doha Round and other potential trade agreements.
So I'm optimistic that we'll be able to make progress. It may not happen immediately. In the meantime, we just have to make sure that we're sending a message to our respective countries that ultimately job growth, income growth, building our way out of this economic crisis, doesn't involve trying to draw a fence around each respective country, but we all have to rise together.

PRESIDENT LULA: Just one thing to mention -- there's a certain justice that you made in your question towards me. Brazil has undertaken an immense effort so that we can reach the Doha Round negotiation agreement still during the Bush administration. Why didn't we manage to close the deal if everybody was agreeing to do so, and there's only a minor divergence between the U.S. and India?
I imagine that that happened because of electoral reasons. That's why we didn't manage to reach a deal at the Doha Round -- because Brazil made concessions on industrial products, and Europe and the U.S. almost managed to reach market access on agriculture for the emerging markets. And at the end, we stayed only with two issues, one agricultural issue in India, and the other one was the subsidies and the agriculture in the U.S.
I believe that now in the midst of this economic crisis, it's more difficult for us to conclude and reach a deal at the Doha Round. But at the same time, I believe that to conclude the Doha Round could be one of the components to relieve the poorest or less developed countries in the world vis-à-vis this crisis.
The U.S. and Brazil trade balance is around $54 billion. The U.S. exports $26 billion to Brazil, and Brazil exports to the U.S. around $28 billion. So it is clear for the size of the two countries, we don't have much trade flow in our trade balance between the two countries. What is the issue? What happens today, every country just wants to sell. Every country wants to engage in trade surplus. It's a two-way street. It's not possible to happen -- (inaudible) -- you sell and buy to keep the balance.
And we need to strengthen this idea because protectionism now, in my opinion, would aggravate the economic crisis if we stop tapping the water in international trade. It's like taking out a fish out of water -- and then you'll lack water. So now we have to bring more dynamics. On the one hand, our domestic economies, and on the other hand we have to help to make more (inaudible) credit for trade, for international trade. I think it's -- this is much more than (inaudible).
I hope that the U.S. and Brazil can mature their thinking and then we can come and arrive on April 2nd in London, and together with other countries we can present to the world a solution. Financial system, yes, it needs regulation -- we cannot afford that. What will be the size of the regulation? Let's discuss it in London. I'm very optimistic.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: I'm always optimistic and I've had a wonderful visit with the President, and I'm looking forward to seeing him in Brazil.

Q When?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: Well, you know, we -- we haven't gotten the days yet. I will tell you that because I'm somebody who grew up in Hawaii, I felt it was very important that I at least go to Rio, where I understand the beaches are pretty nice. (Laughter.)

Q Can you start at the Amazon?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: You know, I would love a trip to the Amazon. I suspect that the Republican Party would love to see me travel through the Amazon and maybe get lost. (Laughter.) But I'm not sure what --

Q We won't let that happen.

PRESIDENT OBAMA: We don't know how long we'll be able to stay, but this will just be the first visit. Hopefully it will be visits that are repeated in the future. So -- but we've had a wonderful visit. I can tell that the relationship between our two countries is only going to get stronger.
Thank you, everybody.

END 12:53 P.M. EDT

18 de março de 2009

As melhores frases do futebol

- Chegarei de surpresa dia 15 , às duas da tarde , vôo 619 da VARIG. (Mengálvio, ex-meia do Santos , em telegrama à família quando em excursão à Europa).

- Tanto na minha vida futebolística quanto com a minha vida ser humana. (Nunes, ex-atacante do Flamengo , em uma entrevista antes do jogo de despedida do Zico).

- Que interessante, aqui no Japão só tem carro importado. (Jardel, ex-atacante do Grêmio).

- As pessoas querem que o Brasil vença e ganhe. (Dunga, em entrevista ao programa Terceiro Tempo)

- Eu, o Paulo Nunes e o Dinho vamos fazer uma dupla sertaneja. (Jardel, ex-atacante do Grêmio).

- O novo apelido do Aloísio é CB, Sangue Bom. (Souza, meio-campo do São Paulo, em uma entrevista ao Jogo Duro).

- A partir de agora o meu coração só tem uma cor, vermelho e preto. (Jogador Fabão, assim que chegou no Flamengo).

- Eu peguei a bola no meio de campo e fui fondo, fui fondo, fui fondo e chutei pro gol. (Jardel , ex- jogador do Vasco e Grêmio, ao relatar ao repórter o gol que tinha feito).

- A bola ia indo, indo, indo... e iu! (Nunes, jogador do Flamengo da década de 80).

- Tenho o maior orgulho de jogar na terra onde Cristo nasceu. (Claudiomiro, ex-meia do Inter de Porto Alegre, ao chegar em Belém do Pará para disputar uma partida contra o Paysandu, pelo Brasileirão de 72).

- Nem que eu tivesse dois pulmões eu alcançava essa bola. (Bradock, amigo de Romário, reclamando de um passe longo).

- No México que é bom. Lá a gente recebe semanalmente de 15 em 15 dias. (Ferreira, ex-ponta esquerda do Santos).

- Quando o jogo está a mil, minha naftalina sobe. (Jardel , ex-atacante do Vasco, Grêmio e da Seleção).

- O meu clube estava a beira do precipício, mas tomou a decisão correta, deu um passo a frente. (João Pinto, jogador do Benfica de Portugal).

- Na Bahia é todo mundo muito simpático. É um povo muito hospitalar. (Zanata, baiano, ex-lateral do Fluminense, ao comentar sobre a hospitalidade do povo baiano).

- Jogador tem que ser completo como o pato, que é um bicho aquático e gramático. (Vicente Matheus, eterno presidente do Corinthians).

- O difícil, como vocês sabem, não é fácil. (Vicente Matheus).

- Achei uma correntinha de ouro com um crucifixo... (Obina, centroavante do Flamengo, respondendo sobre o que havia achado do jogo).

- Haja o que hajar, o Corinthians vai ser campeão. (Vicente Matheus).

- O Sócrates é invendável, inegociável e imprestável. (Vicente Matheus, ao recusar a oferta dos franceses).

16 de março de 2009

A melhor vaselina

Um homem com cara de mau elemento entra numa farmácia e vai logo pedindo:
- Eu quero um pote de vaselina.


O farmacêutico vai ao depósito, traz um frasco e entrega ao cliente.
O cara abre o pote, cheira, sente a textura e reclama:
- Mas que porcaria é essa? Essa vaselina é fedorenta e muito seca!Você não tem uma vaselina de melhor qualidade, não?

O farmacêutico retorna ao depósito e volta com outra marca de vaselina na mão,dizendo:
- Essa aqui é um pouco mais cara, mas é da boa!

O cara faz o mesmo ritual: abre o pote, cheira, sente a textura e ainda reclama:
- Olha só, meu camarada, essa aqui até tem um cheiro um pouco mais agradável, mas é muito pouco oleosa... Eu quero a melhor vaselina quevocê tiver, entendeu? É para comer um cu, ouviu?

O farmacêutico volta ao depósito e traz uma nova embalagem:
- Essa é a melhor que existe! Só que vou avisando... Prepare o bolso, pois essa custa R$ 120 o pote. É importada da Inglaterra!

O cara batea mão no balcão e grita:
- Foda-se o preço! Eu pedi uma vaselina de primeira linha!
O homem cheira o pote, experimenta a viscosidade com os dedos e aprova.
- Agora sim... Essa cheira bem. E olha essa textura, ótima, vou levar!

Ele paga os R$ 120,00 e se manda todo sorridente.

Um velhinho que esperava sua vez de ser atendido e assistiu à discussão entre os dois, diz, sem pestanejar:
- Esse cara é bicha!

O farmacêutico retruca:
- Que é isso meu senhor, o homem com aquela cara de mau, veio aqui e comprou uma vaselina da boa... Ele quer é impressionar algum mulherão!

O velho, mostrando, toda sua experiência adquirida ao longo dos anos, rebate com um tom de filósofo:
- Não, meu filho... Ninguém toma tanto cuidado assim quando o cu é dos outros...